Current:Home > reviewsSouth Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech -WealthRise Academy
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
View
Date:2025-04-17 00:27:56
SEOUL, Dec 12 - South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol's switch from contrition to defiance on Thursday (Dec 11) over his martial law order rallied some supporters but other members of his party said it did nothing to sway their view that he must be removed from office.
In a speech before a second impeachment vote scheduled for Saturday, Yoon condemned his political opponents as "anti-state forces" that side with enemies in North Korea, said Pyongyang may have hacked the South's elections and defended last week's short-lived martial law order as a legal move to protect democracy.
The remarks hit many of the talking points featuring on conservative YouTube channels and marked a sharp change of tone from a speech before the first impeachment vote last week in which he apologised and said he would place his political future in the hands of his People Power Party.
It was unclear what caused the change but Yoon gave no sign of supporting a proposal by PPP leader Han Dong-hoon for him to resign in coming months and to hand authority to the prime minister and ruling party until then.
The speech brought to the fore divisions in the PPP. Changing tack, Han urged party members to vote for impeachment on Saturday, a move greeted by shouting from pro-Yoon lawmakers, who voted in Kweon Seong-dong as their new party floor leader shortly after Yoon's speech.
[[nid:712402]]
Kweon, a Yoon supporter, said the party's position was still to oppose the president's impeachment but that a meeting would be held before Saturday's vote to finalise plans.
The party boycotted the last vote, preventing a quorum. At least 200 votes are needed to impeach Yoon. Opposition parties have 192 seats, so they need at least eight PPP members to join.
As of Thursday, at least seven members of the party were expected to support a new impeachment motion.
One PPP lawmaker who said he would now vote to impeach Yoon said the president's new remarks may have rallied some loyalists but sowed more confusion and division among conservatives.
[[nid:712337]]
"His speech had an impact on the election of the floor leader. Also, it sounds like he urged those who blindly follow the president among conservatives to take action," PPP lawmaker Kim Sang-wook told reporters.
Kim said he felt frustrated and betrayed because the speech dashed his last hopes that Yoon would leave office in a "decent" way.
Public support for impeachment
Opinion polls show a majority of South Koreans support impeaching Yoon. A survey released by pollster Realmeter on Dec. 5 found 73.6 per cent of respondents supported impeachment, including 50.4 per cent of those who identified themselves as conservatives.
Yoon's speech lit up conservative political forums online, with the top-ranked posts titled "Martial law was the most reasonable decision", and "Han made a wrong decision".
After Yoon's speech, scuffles could be seen breaking out between attendees of a pro-conservative rally in central Seoul and an opposition supporter who removed a banner of support for Yoon's martial law declaration.
Kim Tae-hyun, who attended the rally, said he thought Yoon did a "good job" with his speech and had the right to declare martial law.
"And the impeachment just shouldn't happen... So (the martial law declaration) was merely an expression of the authority of the president," said Kim. "The Democratic Party, which is currently holding the country back, is the real issue."
[[nid:712404]]
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (61769)
Related
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Mark Consuelos Reveals Warning Text He Received From Daughter Lola During Live With Kelly & Mark
- Chemours Says it Will Dramatically Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Aiming for Net Zero by 2050
- Transcript: University of California president Michael Drake on Face the Nation, July 2, 2023
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Indiana Supreme Court ruled near-total abortion ban can take effect
- Woman hit and killed by stolen forklift
- Alabama Town That Fought Coal Ash Landfill Wins Settlement
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Power Plants on Indian Reservations Get No Break on Emissions Rules
Ranking
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- An Android update is causing thousands of false calls to 911, Minnesota says
- Power Plants on Indian Reservations Get No Break on Emissions Rules
- The Best Powder Sunscreens That Prevent Shine Without Ruining Makeup
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- Jennie Ruby Jane Shares Insight Into Bond With The Idol Co-Star Lily-Rose Depp
- Ahead of the Climate Summit, Environmental Groups Urge Biden to Champion Methane Reductions as a Quick Warming Fix
- California Climate Change Report Adds to Evidence as State Pushes Back on Trump
Recommendation
Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
Elle Fanning Recalls Losing Role in Father-Daughter Film at 16 for Being Unf--kable
Federal Courts Help Biden Quickly Dismantle Trump’s Climate and Environmental Legacy
Indiana Supreme Court ruled near-total abortion ban can take effect
Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
California Climate Change Report Adds to Evidence as State Pushes Back on Trump
Supreme Court takes up case over gun ban for those under domestic violence restraining orders
Environmental Justice Bill Fails to Pass in California